Saturday, 19 October 2013

Comparing lenses - blur characteristics


The advent of digital cinema cameras has seen a revival of interest in older or "legacy" cine lenses, less than perfect in technical terms but often full of character and sometimes a welcome antidote to overly clinical digital imagery. While filters and manipulation in post can achieve similar ends, a lens creates its own unique effects due to its optical design, and responds to changes in real world lighting organically.

I thought it might be interesting to compare some modern 35mm format cine lenses with a few older examples, by looking at their projection characteristics. A lens test projector is a standard tool in lens repair and manufacturing facilities, it allows a technician to project a test reticle onto a large screen or wall and assess the lens for optical quality, aberrations or mechanical issues, to check the close distance scale and back-focus, and assists in making adjustments like element centering or zoom tracking.

Assessments are always done with a focussed image, but it's also quite interesting to see how lenses transmit light when they're defocused, which is mainly a product of how the aberrations have been corrected in the lens design, modulated by the f-stop, and to a lesser extent, by the shape of the iris aperture. The nature of the aberration correction will cause a different effect depending on whether the out-of-focus area is behind or in front of the plane of focus. The out-of-focus rendering plays an important part in the look of a lens, not just in the often discussed 'bokeh' but also in how sharpness falls off from the plane of best focus.

In the following comparisons, I took pictures of just the lower left quarter of the test image, with the test lens sharply focused (at 5 feet),  and then defocused (with the focus set to around 2 feet). All lenses were between 30 and 38mm in focal length and were set to maximum aperture (between f/1.7 and f/2.1, except the Zeiss Super Speed which opens to f/1.2). The defocused images represent how each lens transmits light from behind the plane of focus, ie the background blur. Disregard the orange dots, which are just horizon and tracking markers on my projection wall. Colour temperature variations and resolution loss are caused by the limitations of my camera (and my photographic incompetence) but I'm only really interested here in showing the overall qualities of contrast and flare and the shape and nature of the blur patterns.

Comparisons



Zeiss Ultra Prime 32mm f/1.7




Zeiss Ultra Prime 32mm f/1.7 defocused


Cooke S4 32mm f/1.8

Cooke S4 32mm f/1.8 defocused


Bausch and Lomb Super Baltar 35mm f/2



Bausch and Lomb Super Baltar 35mm f/2 defocused



Meyer Gorlitz Primoplan 30mm f/1.9


Meyer Gorlitz Primoplan 30mm f/1.9 defocused



Ross XPres 38mm f/1.9


Ross XPres 38mm f/1.9 defocused



Schneider Arriflex-Cine-Xenon 35mm f/2


Schneider Arriflex-Cine-Xenon 35mm f/2 defocused



Zeiss Super Speed 35mm f/1.2


Zeiss Super Speed 35mm f/1.2 defocused



Cooke Speed Panchro 32mm f/2.1


Cooke Speed Panchro 32mm f/2.1 defocused




Screen grabs

And now some screen grabs taken on an Arri Alexa to compare how each lens renders background blur in the real world (or at least out the window of Cameraquip). Each shot was taken at around f/2. Modern lenses like the Ultra Primes and S4s are quite similar, but it's surprising how different some of the older designs look. The Ross XPres came from a 1930s Debrie Parvo, the Meyer Primoplan from a WW2 Arriflex 35, the Schneider Cine-Xenon design dates from the 1950s, the Bausch & Lomb Super Baltar is from a 1960s Mitchell. Along with Baltars and Super Baltars, Cooke Speed Panchros were the most widely used cinema lenses in the decades after WW2. Zeiss Super Speeds became industry standards in the 1980s, Ultra Primes and Cooke S4s arrived in the late 90s.


Zeiss Ultra Prime 32mm

Cooke S4 32mm

Bausch & Lomb Super Baltar 35mm

Meyer Gorlitz Primoplan 30mm

Ross XPres 38mm

Schneider Kreuznach Cine-Xenon 35mm

Zeiss Super Speed 35mm

Cooke Speed Panchro 32mm

11 comments:

  1. What camera did you use for your test images?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi chicken,
      I photographed the projection images with a Nikon D200, just basic JPEGs. The shots out the window of defocused foliage are frame grabs taken on an Arri Alexa.

      Delete
  2. Thanks for the response. Would you know if the Meyer Gorlitz Primoplan 30mm covers a full frame sensor?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey Dom. How did you mount cine PL lens on the Nikon? I didn't you could do that. Can I mount them on my D7100? Really nice tests. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Shaheryar,
      the lenses weren't mounted on the Nikon, they were mounted on a test projector which projects an image of a test pattern through the lens onto a wall or screen. It's a standard tool in lens manufacture and repair facilities. I used the Nikon just to photograph the projected test images.
      The pictures of a Bolex in front of a window are screen grabs taken with an Arri Alexa.

      Delete
  4. how did you mount a Meyer Gorlitz Primoplan 30mm to an alexa and where did you get that lens?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi martin,
      the Meyer Gorlitz Primoplan is in Arri Standard mount and comes off a WWII era Arriflex 35 from our museum. To mount it on an Alexa it just required an Arri Standard to PL adapter.

      Delete
  5. Hi Dom,
    Thanks for doing these tests, they are very interesting. I have a shoot coming up where I am interested in using a lens with that swirly bokeh. I was curious if you knew where I could find the Primoplan lens in Los Angeles anywhere? Also, is the Schneider Xenon's that you used a modern lens? Thanks for your time!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Tyler,
    the Primoplan is from the late 30s or early 40s, off a very early WW2 Arri 35 that is in our rental house museum. I don't think anyone will have them for rent.
    The Xenon is from the 60s but the design goes back to before the war I believe. They are much more common.

    ReplyDelete